In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Using <blockquote> as an indentation device is misguided (it says so in > the spec). It's not ideal, but it is the best we could do and support backwards compatibility with older, non-css aware mail clients. Would you have us use <ul>, like 4.x did? At least <blockquote> is legal html. > I think <p style="margin-left: 4px;> is misguided also. If > the indentation has a special meaning, it should be expressed with a > paragraph class and a style sheet with a ruleset matching that class. If > it only a presentational thing, it should be expressed in a style sheet > with a ruleset matching regular paragraphs. Thats great for a dreamworld where everyone who received such mail would see what you expected them to see. Beleive me I wish we could use css extensively in mail. -- jfrancis .com -and- moose .net @netscape @ricochet
- Supporting real paragraphs by default Henri Sivonen
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default fantasai
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default Henri Sivonen
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default Karl Ove Hufthammer
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default fantasai
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default Joe Francis
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default Joe Francis
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default Matthew Thomas
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default Joe Francis
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default Matthew Thomas
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default fantasai
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default fantasai
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default Simon Fraser
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default Joe Francis
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Supporting real paragraphs by default Joe Francis
