jesus X wrote: ... >> I expect this memory usage issue to be resolved, and to be resolved with >> little fuss on the part of the bloat-merchants(!) if they want people to >> take their software seriously. > > > This is the very attitude I'm against. I comes across as, "I'm using and old > machine, and I demand that you cater to me, even though I'm in a small > minority." Actually, it's your attitude that allows software companies to keep writing crappy, unoptimized software :-) I agree with you that Mozilla is a fairly complex application - but other, equally complex applications seem to have no trouble running in 32-64Megs (e.g. IE, NS 4.x, Opera 5.) And your point about "...even though I'm in a small minority" seems to be unsubstantiated by facts. I would wager that there are a heck of alot more PCs with 64Megs or less out there - BEING USED - than there are those with more. Tom
- About minimum platform requirements. jesus X
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Hall Stevenson
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Sebastian Sp�th
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Henri Sivonen
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Grey Hodge / jesus X
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Stuart Ballard
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Jonathan
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. David Murray
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. jesus X
- Re: About minimum platform requireme... Stuart Ballard
- Re: About minimum platform requireme... Thomas Wolf
- Re: About minimum platform requ... Daniel Veditz
- Re: About minimum platform requireme... David Murray
- Re: About minimum platform requ... gerbil
- Re: About minimum platform ... Henning Schnoor
- Re: About minimum platf... Greg Miller
- Re: About minimum platform ... jesus X
- Re: About minimum platform requireme... Matthew Thomas
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. jesus X
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Simon P. Lucy
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Bill Lipa
