Thomas Wolf wrote: > > jesus X wrote: > > > This is the very attitude I'm against. I comes across as, "I'm using and old > > machine, and I demand that you cater to me, even though I'm in a small > > minority." > > Actually, it's your attitude that allows software companies to keep > writing crappy, unoptimized software :-) I agree with you that Mozilla > is a fairly complex application - but other, equally complex > applications seem to have no trouble running in 32-64Megs (e.g. > IE, NS 4.x, Opera 5.) While the argument rages here, other folks are actually *fixing* the bloat problems. It's slow going, but you can see progress in the nightlies and evidence of the work in other newsgroups and check-in comments. -Dan Veditz
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Hall Stevenson
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Sebastian Sp�th
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Henri Sivonen
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Grey Hodge / jesus X
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Stuart Ballard
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Jonathan
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. David Murray
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. jesus X
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Stuart Ballard
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Thomas Wolf
- Re: About minimum platform requireme... Daniel Veditz
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. David Murray
- Re: About minimum platform requireme... gerbil
- Re: About minimum platform requ... Henning Schnoor
- Re: About minimum platform ... Greg Miller
- Re: About minimum platform requ... jesus X
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Matthew Thomas
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. jesus X
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Simon P. Lucy
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Bill Lipa
- Re: About minimum platform requirements. Hans-Peter Fischer
