"Simon P. Lucy" wrote:
<snip>
> Being guilty of it myself sometimes, when I've time enough to comment but
> not enough to edit (its a psychological thing), I have it at both ends,
> certainly complaining about it doesn't win you back any time, and for some
> I just flip to the end of the message and scan read backwards.
If you don't want to read 30 pages of previou replies then we ought to
do in.
senews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape. macintosh.
The moderators (Champions) there Demand Top posting. if you want to go
there and lurk and see hwo it works feel free.
That way you read the post in historical order. If you want to read the
thread as it was posted then read the last post then what was posted
befor, and what was posted before that. its so logical.
> On the whole I try to comment in context.
>
> In other fora, people complain bitterly about top-posting, personally I can
> think of more useful irritants to bicker about, like the weather.
>
> Simon
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!
