Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs?

[Daniel Veditz]

"Scott I. Remick" wrote:
> 
> The truth is, Mozilla needs to get its memory usage to BELOW that of 4.x,
> even though hardware has improved.  I thought that was one of the
> goals... do more, with less.  Yes, I know that Mozilla has to do a LOT
> more than 4.x did.  But when we were told that Mozilla would be smaller,
> I thought that it was referring to the size THEN, not an arbitrarily
> adjusted size in the future if 4.x had be scaled for hardware-inflation.
> 
> Is this just not possible?  Have we lost one of the original goals?

Reducing bloat is a high priority for mozilla 1.0, as can be seen from
traffic on the .performance, .porkjockies, .embedding and other groups.
There are no "big wins", it's going to take a lot of incremental
improvements in a lot of areas, and that's going to take time.

-Dan Veditz