In article <92ncd2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ross Evans" wrote: > Mozilla could play a part in stopping this from happening, but given the > rate of progress, and the emphasis on creating a 'application development > framework' rather than what 99% of people want from the project a light > weight web browser, this seems unlikely. I think Mozilla-the-browser has to major problems: 1) Other Internet apps are tied to the browser 2) The front end isn't native OTOH, iCab and IE 5 for Mac both have native FEs and aren't tied to other Internet apps. They are both more usable than Mozilla and, ironically, their UIs are more customizable, too. -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Daniel Veditz
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Ross Evans
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Gervase Markham
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Ross Evans
- [OFF TOPIC] Re: Isn't Mozilla fo... Asa Dotzler
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than ... David Murray
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Henri Sivonen
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than ... Gervase Markham
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Bill Lipa
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Ross Evans
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Henri Sivonen
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Henri Sivonen
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Asa Dotzler
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Matthew Thomas
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Gervase Markham
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Bill Lipa
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Gervase Markham
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Mark Anderson
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more ... Gervase Markham
