> It still makes sense to describe Mozilla as a web browser, even if it > isn't 100% accurate. "Web browser" is succinct and easy to understand, > while "open-source internet application framework" is vague and > effectively meaningless. I'm open to suggestions :-) Problem is, if we keep saying it's a web browser, others will keep saying "why does it have all this stuff a web browser doesn't need"? And it would be a fair question. > The web browser component of Mozilla is the most significant piece to an > end user. This is another argument altogether - AIUI, Mozilla isn't *for* end users (although they are very welcome to use it.) :-) Gerv
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? David Murray
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Henri Sivonen
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Gervase Markham
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Bill Lipa
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Ross Evans
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Henri Sivonen
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Henri Sivonen
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Asa Dotzler
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Matthew Thomas
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Gervase Markham
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Bill Lipa
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Gervase Markham
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Mark Anderson
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Gervase Markham
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Ben Bucksch
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Isn't Mozilla for more than PCs? Simon P. Lucy
