Rick Parrish wrote: > > There are XPCOM applications out there that don't want/need/care > about a browser but scream for a modular, component based architecure. [...] > Heck, why have a mozilla.org site? Why not call it > http://www.aol.com/netscape/projects/mozilla ? mozilla.org is not devoted only to the Mozilla browser suite, there are several sub-projects such as webtools like Bugzilla and Tinderbox. Perhaps the front page could make the separate projects a little more visible; if standalone-XPCOM picks up some active champions it could easily be given more prominence. -Dan Veditz
- Re: XPCOM.org? Wan-Teh Chang
- Re: XPCOM.org? Jon Smirl
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Rick Parrish
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Ari Heitner
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Ari Heitner
- Re: XPCOM.org? Ari Heitner
- Re: XPCOM.org? Simon P. Lucy
- Re: XPCOM.org? Daniel Veditz
- Re: XPCOM.org? jesus X
- Re: XPCOM.org? Rick Parrish
- Re: XPCOM.org? Braden McDaniel
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
- Re: XPCOM.org? Brendan Eich
- Re: XPCOM.org? Pierre Phaneuf
