can't believe some one is taking up for the underdog.
The development of any product whether its a developers paradise, is
that the product is eventully designed for an end user in mind. This
applies for a Lincoln Towncar, a Farrari,and MGb, Roll Royce, or Mozilla/Netscape.
Garth Wallace wrote:
>
> Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> >> This is the single most arrogant thing I've ever seen in here.
> >
> > Arrogant? Maybe. Completely true? Absolutely. Mozilla is, always has been
> > and probably always will be a developers product, driven by the desires of
> > the people at the codeface (or their managers ;-)
> >
> > Gerv
>
> True? Maybe. Poorly phrased? Absolutely. ;) It's stuff like that that
> makes people like Philip M. Jones feel like their concerns are being
> ignored in favor of what developers think a browser should do, and makes
> people like Ross Evans feel justified in whining and generally
> irritating developers.
>
> Developing a product for people whose requirements are driven by
> end-user needs and preferences is developing a product with the end-user
> in mind. Saying otherwise is just semantic meandering with no real
> relevance, and only serves to alienate potential users.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!
