Carlfish wrote:
> > No, I'm not saying that. I'm telling you what is here, and in the pipe. Hard
> > fact. Java is always "more folks will do stuff in the future when they see
> > how great it is!" Mozilla is "people are doing things NOW with it."
> http://www.pixeldate.com/dev/comparison/index.shtml
> Note the order. C++. Java. Several miles of daylight. Perl.
> Tell me where Mozilla/XUL development fits in on the graphs, please.
Currently I doubt there are many job OPENINGS seeing as how the companies who
are developing with it are doing so now, but I'd probably put it above Cobol.
REmember though, anyone who knows HTML (not a programming language, but not on
that list either) can write XUL.
> Please try to keep track of what's actually happening in the computer
> industry before making such blatantly incorrect statements.
I do. I have to, it's the industry in which I work. Try being slightly more
polite in the future.
> Java on the client side is dead, except for a few helper apps that come with
> databases. Server-side Java is so big you'd have to be blind or
> ignorant not to have noticed it.
I never said it wasn't big, I said I've seen few USEFUL apps. I'm not a big fan
of server side Java either, but that is where the majority of useful Java
development is.
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
web [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ]
tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ]
warning [ All your base are belong to us. ]
