FB wrote:
>
> Bill Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
> > I got Moz .9 running again by deleting the registry.dat (for about the
> > 50th time), but now I had to start/import a new profile again, and it
> > put it in windows/application data/mozilla.....! Jesus, how about a
> > little consistancy. I already had a salted pref directory under
> > Mozilla!
> >
> > Well, I'm back to N4.7+. I got Moz .9 running again, but it's also
> > trashed all my newsgroups (I've also sent in 3 or 4 feedbacks this
> > morning alone). I know how to fix this, but frankly, I getting tired
> > jumping through all these hoops every few days just to run Moz. I'll
> > wait for 1.0 and hope the programmers can finally make Mail/News work
> > *reliably*. I've been an official beta tester before (visual Page, Namo
> > web editor, etc.) so maybe my perspective is skewed, but it really seems
> > like they just don't have a handle on this. How may years has it
> > been? I know if this was a regular *purchased* product, they sure as
> > hell would have had their act together long before now.
> >
> > bl
>
> Mozilla milestones are not necessarily meant to be of beta quality.
> They are released to allow people to test mozilla
> and report bugs. If all you want is a working program and you don't
> want to be part of
> that testing then you *should* stick to ns4.7. If you want to be part
> of a community that's trying to build
> a better browser, then use and test Mozilla.
That's exactly what I'm trying to do, but I'm afraid I don't have the
time to trouble shoot the installation every few days and
reinstall/reconfigure everything just to keep it working. I think
that's asking too much of 'testers'. And if Moz .9 ain't beta quality
by now, it'll damn well better hurry up cuz 1.0 is coming up fast.
bl
