And it came to pass that Carlfish wrote:

>On Wed, 30 May 2001 23:58:13 -0400, DeMoN_LaG 
>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> somehow managed to
>   type: 
>
>>AOL already said no to their renewal.  They said something
>>to the affect of "We don't need your adverising".  Which
>>they don't.  They have, what, 9.2 ^ 10 users or something? 
>>Why advertise anymore? 
>
>I don't know about the USA, but they're carpet-bombing the TV
>with adverts in Australia, and you can still wallpaper your
>room with free AOL CDs. There's two sitting in my mailbox at
>the moment because I haven't emptied the junk mail for a
>while. 
>
>http://www.msnbc.com/news/578362.asp?cp1=1
>
>"Microsoft, AOL near Windows pact.
>
>AOL will be bundled with XP and will distribute IE browser."
>
>This is the last I heard of it. Is there more recent news
>that I've missed?
>
>

Yep.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/business/newsid_1365000/1365950.stm



-- 
}:-)       Christopher Jahn
{:-(         Dionysian Reveler
  
I've learned that you cannot make someone love you.
All you can do is stalk them and hope they panic and give in.
 
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom

Reply via email to