jesus X wrote:
>
> JTK wrote:
> > > Or maybe it's opinion. Ever think of that?
> > No.
>
> Time you did then.
>
> > Huh? "To show the progress that has been made"?!? I thought that was
> > why 6.0 was released.
>
> No, Netscape released 6.0 because they NEEDED to get a new version out before
> the year ended. Their choice was rushed by their marketing department, and had
> nothing to do with Mozilla.
>
Right there: Netscape has nothing to do with Mozilla. Your words, not
mine. I suppose you believe Netscape 6.0 just packaged itself up and
shipped?
> > About two years too late, even if true. Who's reviewed NS6.1? I've not
> > read a single review yet (other than from the Faithful). The world has
> > forgotten about Netscape, rabbi.
>
> While I don't really care about Netscape PRs, I know CNet reviewed it. Their
> reviewers were guarded but optimistic for the final 6.1. We all know that 6.0
> final sucked, and that the PRs, while beta, were high for beta quality, while
> 6.0 final was crap for final quality, so CNet is taking it a bit more carefully
> with 6.1, but are optimistic that 6.1 final will be everything 6.0 should and
> could have been. The average user rating is 4 stars, which is damn good for a
> beta. 69% of the users gave it a "thumbs up".
>
Yep, read the CNet review. Also read the one praising 6.0, you
remember, the one they had to later retract since they obviously had
never even run the program?
> ZD Net mentioned it, but I can't locate a review in a few moments of searching.
> It's users also gave it an average of 4 out of 5 stars.
>
Pfhht, yeah, but everyone knows ZDNet is just a Micro$oft mouthpiece.
> > > Yes, NS6 sucked, we all know that. But I think you need to
> > > take a fresh look at where things are.
> > I do that pretty much every day. And when I do so, I'm loudly accused
> > of being a "hypocrite" by certain religious factions of the Body.
>
> I know for a fact you do not look at it every day as in another group you admit
> to not having seen the new Modern theme, which is a couple months old. Now's
> who's lying?
>
Um, Jesus... I use the Communicator-looking theme exclusively. I have
never had reason to look at the "Modern" one (that's the horrid blue
one, right?) because the last time I looked it was a complete freakshow,
switching skins has been one of the most buggy aspects of Maozilla as
far as I can tell, and at any rate I hate the whole skinning concept.
You're not doing too good for an omnipotent being, my friend.
> --
> jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
> email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
> web [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ]
> tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ]
> warning [ All your base are belong to us. ]
