jesus X wrote:
> JTK wrote:
>
>>Right there: Netscape has nothing to do with Mozilla. Your words, not
>>mine. I suppose you believe Netscape 6.0 just packaged itself up and
>>shipped?
>>
>
> No, Netscape took a copy of the tree, added their proprietary crap, bundled it
> up and shipped it. Mozilla went along it's merry way in the mean time.
>
And how exactly did it do that, with the Netscape folks tied up on the
Netscape build? Or did a bunch of scabs temporarily replace the
Netscape developers?
>
>>Yep, read the CNet review. Also read the one praising 6.0, you
>>remember, the one they had to later retract since they obviously had
>>never even run the program?
>>
>
> Yes, I remember that ball of crap very well. That's why they're treading lightly
> this time. Like I said, GUARDED optimism. :)
>
Odd that such a Micro$oft mouthpiece should praise non-MS software while
not even having looked at it.
>>You're not doing too good for an omnipotent being, my friend.
>>
>
> That's where the X part of my handle come in. I was a prototype. Consider me a
> Pre-Release deity. ;)
>
I thought the "X" was pronounced "ten". ;-)
> --
> jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
> email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
> web [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ]
> tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ]
> warning [ All your base are belong to us. ]
>
