JTK wrote:
> Right there: Netscape has nothing to do with Mozilla. Your words, not
> mine. I suppose you believe Netscape 6.0 just packaged itself up and
> shipped?
No, Netscape took a copy of the tree, added their proprietary crap, bundled it
up and shipped it. Mozilla went along it's merry way in the mean time.
> Yep, read the CNet review. Also read the one praising 6.0, you
> remember, the one they had to later retract since they obviously had
> never even run the program?
Yes, I remember that ball of crap very well. That's why they're treading lightly
this time. Like I said, GUARDED optimism. :)
> > ZD Net mentioned it, but I can't locate a review in a few moments of
> > searching. It's users also gave it an average of 4 out of 5 stars.
> Pfhht, yeah, but everyone knows ZDNet is just a Micro$oft mouthpiece.
I agree, and they didn't really REVIEW it, but they put it up for download. The
users seemed to like it...
> You're not doing too good for an omnipotent being, my friend.
That's where the X part of my handle come in. I was a prototype. Consider me a
Pre-Release deity. ;)
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
web [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ]
tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ]
warning [ All your base are belong to us. ]
