And it came to pass that Cexy� wrote:
>
> "Christopher Jahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> And it came to pass that Cexy� wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > "Cevpx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> >> Christopher Jahn wrote:
>>
>> >> > Adding a flowered background or six kind of fonts in
>> >> > seven colors just doesn't seem to be a compelling
>> >> > argument for screwing these people.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Screw who?
>> >
>> > Ok can somebody give me an answer to this
>> > question.........Is Rich Text HTML no pictures or flowers
>> > but just TEXT! Who is finally going to get some? Damn I
>> > need to post that in the history books!
>>
>> Rich Text is a MicroSoft proprietary format, and is NOT
>> plaintext. It is also not HTML.
>
> Ok lets go a step farther..........if Rich Text is not
> plaintext and also not HTML can I make a post in this group
> alt.netscape using Rich Text and *NOT* have some moron jump
> my Ass for posting in HTML?
>
That's assuming anyone will be able to read the proprietary
format at all. Many clients simply do not "see" RTF, they find
a blank message.
Stick with plaintext. Or don't post.
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
If it weren't for lawyers, I think we could have invented a
universal symbolic representation of reality.
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
