"Christopher Jahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> And it came to pass that Cexy� wrote:
>
> >
> > "Christopher Jahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> And it came to pass that Cexy� wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > "Cevpx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> >> Christopher Jahn wrote:
> >>
> >> >> > Adding a flowered background or six kind of fonts in
> >> >> > seven colors just doesn't seem to be a compelling
> >> >> > argument for screwing these people.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Screw who?
> >> >
> >> > Ok can somebody give me an answer to this
> >> > question.........Is Rich Text HTML no pictures or flowers
> >> > but just TEXT! Who is finally going to get some? Damn I
> >> > need to post that in the history books!
> >>
> >> Rich Text is a MicroSoft proprietary format, and is NOT
> >> plaintext. It is also not HTML.
> >
> > Ok lets go a step farther..........if Rich Text is not
> > plaintext and also not HTML can I make a post in this group
> > alt.netscape using Rich Text and *NOT* have some moron jump
> > my Ass for posting in HTML?
> >
>
> That's assuming anyone will be able to read the proprietary
> format at all. Many clients simply do not "see" RTF, they find
> a blank message.
>
> Stick with plaintext. Or don't post.
What/who are these many clients.............could it be the servers are
filtering out RTF?
Donna
