On Fri, 06 Jul 2001 19:10:37 +0200, Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if the sig were just plain text (body) and not some weird preformat > (whatever that is), then nothing would disappear. Why do wec need this > silly and buggy preformat anyhow? It seems to serve no purpose more > important than the damage it is causing (editing forwarded mails in the > preformat part causes all kinds of chaos). The .signature is a plaintext file. What do you mean by "preformat"? Holger -- Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. (Douglas Adams) Netscape 6 Tips deutsch: http://www.hmetzger.de
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABOVE the Qu... Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABOVE t... Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABOVE the Qu... Jay Garcia
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABOVE the Qu... Greg Miller
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABOVE the Qu... Nick Ambrose
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABOVE t... Peter Lairo
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... Holger Metzger
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... J.B. Moreno
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... Holger Metzger
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... Peter Lairo
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... Holger Metzger
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... Peter Lairo
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... J.B. Moreno
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... Peter Lairo
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... Peter Lairo
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... W.
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... Peter Lairo
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... W.
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABO... Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
