And it came to pass that Peter Lairo wrote:
> J.B. Moreno wrote:
>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Lairo
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Just create a new mail and make sure the formatting bar is
>>>visible (font, bold, underline, add table, etc.). I you
>>>place the curser in the body of your message, the little
>>>button on the left will say "body", if the curser is in
>>>your signature, trhe button says "preformat".
>>>
>>
>> Ah, well, that doesn't really have anything to do with
>> anything. At least not anything to do with why the
>> signature should come after the body. As has been said any
>> number of times, the reason the signature comes after the
>> body is because that is what it *is*: the text that comes
>> after the body, and is separated by it by the sigdash.
>
>
> Wrong, *MY signature should come after MY body text*, and
> not way down below after a bunch of other body texts by any
> number of people.
No, Peter, YOU'RE wrong; by quoting those people, you've made
those texts a PART of your message.
The solution you need isn't to break the .sig, but to place the
quotes into an attached file.
>
>
>>
>> To speak of the sig being in the middle of the message is
>> roughly the equivalent of talking about the headers that
>> come in the middle of the message.
>>
>
> Wrong again, it's a matter of *MY signature coming after MY
> body text*. It's so clear, I don't see why you don't get it.
>
Because you're wrong ;-)
As stated above, by quoting, you make the quotes a part of *your
mesage*. THAT's so clear, I don't see why YOU don't get it.
It's the same in ANY correspondence. The rules of style and
format do not change with the medium.
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
Be excellent to each other
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
