On 09 Jul 2001 00:53:21 +0200, Peter Lairo wrote:
> >You are comparing apples to oranges.  When you send a fax, in the manner
> >meantioned above, you also don't cut out the dialog you're not referring
> >to (as I have done here) and write your responses following the other
> >writer's statements (again as I have done here).  Once this has been
> >done, the quoted text becomes part of your post, hence the signature at
> >the end of the entire message.  If however you are leaving the entire
> >text of the original message intact as an "attachment" then yes, I agree
> >that your signature would come before the attachements.  However as
> >indicated above these are two different things.
> >
> I think you might not want to understand. I may attach only PART of the 
> relevant correspondence to a fax, but still place my signature below MY 
> text.

No, I understand.  It's still apples to oranges.  Christopher Jahn
described what I was getting at a little better.  Either way when you
are faxing you are doing more of an "attach" than an inline quote.  For
inline quotes your signature belongs after all of the text, even the
quoted text.

Jamin W. Collins

Reply via email to