Re: JTK again & still a disruptive element

[JTK]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, jesus X says...
>
>Ian Hickson wrote:
>> I refer the intelligent reader to the 16+ posts recently mentioned which
>> indicate pretty clearly the lack of any "truth" in the alleged "sting".
>
>If you're referring to my post, it only had 14 links, but I was just getting
>tired by that mountain of irrefutable truth and quit after 14. :)

Yeah yeah rabbi, I'll get to your list.  Keep your shorts on.

-- 
JTK