Ian Hickson wrote: > I refer the intelligent reader to the 16+ posts recently mentioned which > indicate pretty clearly the lack of any "truth" in the alleged "sting". If you're referring to my post, it only had 14 links, but I was just getting tired by that mountain of irrefutable truth and quit after 14. :) -- jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ] email [ jesusx @ who.net ] web [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ] tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ] warning [ All your base are belong to us. ]
- Re: Dealing With Peter Lairo Effectively Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Dealing With Peter Lairo Effectively DeMoN_LaG
- JTK again & still a disruptive element Peter Lairo
- Re: JTK again & still a disruptive eleme... JTK
- Re: JTK again & still a disruptive e... Eric Smith
- Re: JTK again & still a disrupti... JTK
- Re: JTK again & still a disr... Eric Smith
- Re: JTK again & still a disr... Ian Hickson
- Re: JTK again & still a... jesus X
- Re: JTK again & still a disr... Tim Wunder
- humour and truth [was: Re: JTK again &am... Michael Gratton
- Re: humour and truth [was: Re: JTK a... JTK
- Re: humour and truth [was: Re: J... Michael Gratton
- Re: humour and truth [was: ... Ian Hickson
- Re: humour and truth [w... jesus X
- Re: JTK again & still a disruptive e... Carlfish
