JTK wrote:
> William Leese wrote:
>>
>> JTK wrote:
>>
>> > William Leese wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I remember something being mentioned about this a while ago. 'fraid a
>> >> quick search on google didn't bring up anything useful so i'll try
>> >> here.
>> >>
>> >> From what i recall mozilla -for security reasons- does not allow urls
>> >> like: http://www.whatever.com:1050.
>> >> But there was a pref you could add to user.js
>> >> to re-enable this.
>>
>> > There is, but I don't remember it either. That's not a real problem
>> > though, because to add insult to injury, THEY'RE ADDING A UI TO IT.
>> > Something to the effect of a "Compensate for Mozilla's defective URL
>> > parser by blocking 'nonstandard' ports" checkbox. Can you imagine?
>>
>> JTK, I kindly ask of you not to reply to my posts unless you truely want
>> to be helpful. This, was not one of those times.
>>
>
> Bill, I kindly ask of you to not pretend to know my motives, 'cause
> you're not much of a mindreader.
>
my, aren't we the hypocrite.
> Sorry Bill, this indeed was "one of those times".
I'll be the judge of that.
> You made it clear you
> didn't know much about the situation, so I figured I'd give you the full
> skinny on it. I apologize if I inadvertantly educated you.
> Perhaps
> others will find it elucidating and appreciate my candor if you won't.
I'll rephrase that purely for the benefit of others, ofcourse: thank you
for giving me an excuse to spew more of my misleading and useless drivel
into this newsgroup.