Christopher Jahn wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">He is correct. 0.92.1 incorporates all of 0.92 fixes plus many 0.93 fixes and additional fixes that were of Netscape priorityAnd it came to pass that David Gerard wrote:On Wed, 08 Aug 2001 12:36:42 -0400,
Pratik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:David Gerard wrote:
:> Netscape 6.1 is up on the ftp site again (though not
:> announced on the page). So what sort of time frame will
:> 0.9.2.1 be arriving in?
:0.9.2.1??? 0.9.3 is out and available
And I suppose you think time is linear, too. I know what I'm
asking. EVERYONE knows 0.9.2.1 comes after 0.9.3.
You should indicate if you're kidding. I hope you are.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Nope, as of now, 0.92.1 has nor being releaed yet by Moz development. 0.93 replaced 0.92, Version 0.92.1 is a branch of 0.92 and it work sin the opposite durection: Netscape returns the code back to Moz. with the additional fixes (minus their propietary features) and Moz releases the code as 0.92.1
(0.9.2.1 is the open-source version of Netscape 6.1. Even
though it's being released after 0.9.3, it's a development
from the 0.9.2 branch, so gets a version number in that
branch.)
0.9.2.1 was released a while back, before 0.9.3 replaced it.
Netscape 6.1 is built on 6.2.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">See above
No further development on 0.9.2.1, as Mozilla has released
0.9.3, and is now working on the NEXT release.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">The relationship is not exactly linear since Netscape might add functionality not present in Moz or their fixes might make their branch stabler and faster than a Moz release. I have been using Netscape 6.1 with Toy Factory theme almost all day .. total number of crashes = ZERO, NADA. Yesterday I used Moz 0.93 for about 4 hours (with Modern theme) and it crashed twice .. not bad
Netscape will always be a little behind Mozilla.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
