[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That's not all you said. You said "Blaming it on screen resolution is just
> lame." Why are you surprised when people get pissy with an adversarial
> statement like that, especially when you have no qualifications to say what
> is lame and what is not?
>
> If you'd left off that last sentence, you'd be in a completely different
> position now.
If you had read the post I was referring to you would have noticed the
neither the poster nor I was giving any indication *who* to blame.
Actually, the poster was putting the "blame" on the resolution *itself*
and not Mozilla. So anyone who would consider this "adversarial" just
didn't understand what was said.
You don't know my qualifications. I may not be able to program, but I
have extensive experience with computers. Also, my powers of observation
and deduction and reasoning are quite good. Based on these
"qualifications", I have noticed that *no other* text program I have
ever used has shown the kind of difficulties Mozilla has. Also, I have
never before seen these kinds of problems as a result of screen
resolution. Your mileage may vary - but I doubt it does (vary in a
significant way).
You aparently have no qualifications to determine who is qualified or
not ;) <-- joke!!!
--
Regards,
Peter Lairo
