> And these #'s from CNET are even more interesting if you > compare them to this paragraph from their Netscape 6.1 > review: > > "We recorded similar results in CNET Labs performance > tests , as well. In our Windows 2000 tests... <snip> > > So, they knew that Netscape 6.1 performed remarkably > better using Windows 2000, but for the IE6 review, 20 > days after their Netscape 6.1 review, they tested using > Windows98. I'm sure Microsoft 'asked' them to use Win98 for this testing... Hall
- IE6.0 Released JTK
- Re: IE6.0 Released ej2k
- Re: IE6.0 Released Holger Metzger
- Re: IE6.0 Released Peter Lairo
- Re: IE6.0 Released Chris Nelson
- Re: IE6.0 Released Steve Morrison
- Re: IE6.0 Released Marc Attinasi
- Re: IE6.0 Released Pierre Chanial
- Re: IE6.0 Released Ian Hickson
- Re: IE6.0 Released Chris Nelson
- Re: IE6.0 Released Hall Stevenson
- Re: IE6.0 Released Randell Jesup
- Re: IE6.0 Released Helge Hielscher
- Re: IE6.0 Released Blake Ross
- Re: IE6.0 Released Blake Ross
- Re: IE6.0 Released Blake Ross
- Re: IE6.0 Released Damien Covey
- Re: IE6.0 Released Ben Ruppel
- Re: IE6.0 Released Hall Stevenson
- Re: IE6.0 Released Ben Ruppel
- Re: IE6.0 Released Henrik Gemal
