they compared NS6.1 with IE5.5 (Performance set =100%)
| NS6.1 test | IE 6 test | |
| Loading Cached Pages | 52% | 34% |
| Loading Nested Tables | 56% | 54% |
| Loading Mixed Text and Graphics | 41% | 53% |
| Caffeine Mark 3.0 Normalized | 42% | 44% |
so where do these different numbers come from? is this the normal fluctuation?
Regards,
Helge
Randell Jesup schrieb:
Steve Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>"We were also a little underwhelmed by IE 6's performance in our speed tests. In one of our tests, IE 6 outperformed IE 5.5 and Netscape 6.1. And IE 6 consistently outperformed Netscape 6.1. However, IE 6 lagged behind its predecessor in almost every other test--not by much, but we'd expect better performance from a major upgrade. "
>http://www.cnet.com/software/0-3227883-8-6982030-3.html
>
>These graphs show mozilla is only 2x-3x slower than IE5.5
>http://www.cnet.com/software/0-3227883-8-6982030-6.htmlSome of their other (summary) graphs show that Mozilla is much
slower than IE5.5 on Win98, but faster than IE5.5 on Win2000 by as much as
1/3rd. This is probably (guess) because of the much worse VM implementation
on Win98.
