JTK wrote:
> WAIT. You've been telling me for weeks if not months here that
> LGPL-only code is codex non gratia. NOW you tell me that there's LGPL
> files in Mozilla?!?!?! What gives?
Not all files in the tree are for the browser suite. Some are testing, debug,
etc. A simple look at the various files in a nightly binary bundle will show you
that.
> If it guessed "non-Mac", it'd be right 95%+ of the time.
And wrong 5% of the time, which is a PITA for anyone building on a Mac, or
wanting to play with XP stuff.
> > > That said, any graphics files in there are covered by some sort of
> > > license, right? How is that specified?
> > That's a very good question :-)
> And the answer is...?
To Be Determined. Or, if you prefer, To Be Announced. I like the former.
> Of course not. But seeing as it's entirely self-contained and links to
> nothing NPL/MPL/whateverPL, there's no reason you couldn't add it to the
> /tools directory along with Mr. Morrison's page loader tests etc.
After saying this you needed to ask what non MPL/NPL files were in the CVS tree
for? :)
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
web [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ]
tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ]
warning [ War doesn't determine who is right, war determines who is left. ]
