Daniel Veditz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 21 Sep 2001:
> Jonathan Wilson wrote:
>
>> As opposed to using visual C++?
>> Other than the use of NMAKE, what other visual C++ only
>> technologies does mozilla use?
>> Is there any reason why a "port" to gcc win32 wouldnt be possible?
>>
>
> There have been attempts to switch the windows builds over to
> autoconf and gmake. From there switching compilers would be much
> easier. Not sure what the status is, I suspect the effort is
> dormant at the moment.
That would be really cool. I mean, I can find a free version of GCC
online. Visual C++ is expensive software, and not a whole lot of
average joe's have access to it
--
ICQ: N/A (temporarily)
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ = m
