There's always the DOM level 1 and DOM level 2 standard.....
basic Erik Harris wrote: > On 1 Oct 2001 11:36:49 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian S. Craigie) wrote: > > >>If you want Moz/NS to be adopted by anyone who doesn't already *love* >>it, you must make it work with all sites, even if they aren't written >>properly. >> > > Bingo! Being a stickler for the standards only works AFTER your product has > become the de facto standard. Personally, I LIKE Mozilla much better than > Netscape or IE, which is much of the REASON I'm being so critical of it in > this newsgroup. If it doesn't work for a good chunk of the websites I visit, > I simply can't justify using it, even if I prefer it otherwise! > > FWIW, the webmaster of DVDAficionado replied to me and seemed very interested > in making the site compliant with the HTML standard. But he also said that > they only support NS4.x and IE5.x, and have no intention of going out of > their way to make the site work on the more obscure web browsers like Mozilla > (or even Netscape 6). Still, the problem with DVDAficionado _appears_ to be > with Mozilla's rendering of the JavaScript menu, NOT the web page itself, so > even if the web master fixes every noncompliant tag on the page, I don't > think it'll make it work correctly in Mozilla. I'd love to be proven wrong, > though. > > Erik Harris eharris1@rocheste$.$$.com > http://w3.to/erik ICQ: 2610172 > Chinese Martial Arts Assoc @ Cornell: http://w3.to/CMAAC/ > > To avoid Spam-bots, my address at the top is INCORRECT. > Change each dollar sign to an "r". >
