Chris Hoess wrote: > Huh? AFAIK, the reason we use jars is to cut down on footprint, which > seriously increases using uncompressed chrome. The fastload changes may > have affected apparent loading speed and won back some of the time needed > to uncompress-on-the-fly, but I'm not sure.
You have a good point there. File size in JAR archives are way smaller. Another reason why I like it myself.
