Ken wrote: > > Malodushnikh wrote: > > > No, that's an incorrect opinion by some very misled engineers who, for > > some reason, believe that all files are faster when they're stored as > > JAR files. > > Well, I'm only reciting the opinions of that Mozilla Quest article pointed to >elsewhere. I > personally can't say if it's faster or not JARred or unJARred.
MozillaQuest.com is not a reputable source of information.
