Adam Lock wrote: > > Garth Wallace wrote: > > > "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote: > > > >> Actually IE for Mac has the ability to use Active-X though I have > >> it > >> turned off. (Have one website I have to use it for) > >> Mozilla does support a Variation on Active-X not based on the > >> Microsoft model. > >> Supposedly all the dangerous code is left out (I belive its called > >> either Xpcom or XUL). > >> > > No it doesn't. It uses a version of COM called XPCOM. > > ActiveX uses a different version of COM written by > > Microsoft. > > > Mozilla is built with XPCOM, but it is possible to host ActiveX > controls albeit in a limited fashion using this plugin: > > http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/plugin.htm
Right, but that plugin isn't actually part of Mozilla. It's possible to write a plugin that would run Nintendo games too, but that doesn't mean that Mozilla supports the NES ROM format.
