In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrea Monni wrote: > Chris Hoess wrote: > >> In article <9vqh2h$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, S�ren Kuklau wrote: >> >>>I have to disagree about the "unfortunately" part. Have you looked at those >>>MachV notes? Download Manager, for instance? Sounds pretty cool to me. >>> >> >> ["TOFU" quoting snipped] >> >> Unfortunately, features do not spring from programmer's heads >> fully-debugged and stable. > > > And so what? If we all reasonate like that there would never be anything > new since everthing might be buggy. >
For everything there is a season, A time to check in and a time not to check in... I'm not opposed to the MachV features per se, and in fact there are many more things I'd like to see become part of Mozilla, but adding all-new features now is getting very close to the wire in terms of making them stable, functional, and usable for Mozilla 1.0. Now, after 1.0 branches, I'm all for a wild scramble to check in cool new stuff so people can start testing it, but we should be close to feature-complete for 1.0 by now. -- Chris Hoess
