Peter Lairo wrote: > That argument is silly. You could make the same argument for any of IE's > non-standard (but widely used) features. This whole favicon thing (to > me) goes against all that Mozilla is trying to achieve.
Why? What standard is it violating? Just because something isn't defined by a standard doesn't mean it's bad. -- jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ] email [ jesusx @ who.net ] web [ http://www.mozillanews.org ] tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ] warning [ "I hate cats. You never know if they're dead." - E. Schrodinger ]
