Ortwin Gl�ck wrote: > > Looking at the bug statistics at > > >http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/reports.cgi?product=-All-&output=show_chart&datasets=NEW%3A&datasets=ASSIGNED%3A&datasets=REOPENED%3A&datasets=UNCONFIRMED%3A&links=1&banner=1 >
They should pull that down, it just makes Mozilla look bad to see all those defects just a-climbin' into the stratosphere. [snip] > If I were a Mozilla project manager You hit the nail on the head right there. Heretofore there has been, from all outward indications, no management whatsoever of the Mozilla project. Hence the disaster you see before you. It has been recently announced, so many years now after the damage was done, that there is now an actual manager of some sort. Its way to late at this point for it to make any difference of course, but it will be interesting to see what sorts of massive upheavals happen in a vain attempt to get Mozilla past that 1% adoption barrier.
