Ben Tremblay wrote: > > JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > Hi Ben! Great to hear from you yet again! > lamer >
Nice capitalization. You must do real well in 'skule', huh Benny? > > Ben Tremblay wrote: > > > JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > > jesus X wrote: > >> > > Blake Ross wrote: > >> > >> Fact: you are terribly misinformed. > >> > >> The number of bugs has skyrocketed over the years because the > number of > >> > >> people reporting them has skyrocketed over the years, and > because we > >> > >> have more features and components than we used to. [...] > >> > > You are 100% right. In fact, I call it Bugzilla Inflation, and > go into > >> > > detail in that article under the Bugzilla Inflation and > Bugzilla Facts > >> > > sections. thanks go to Asa for helping me compile those > numbers, too. > > > > AH! So *THE LORD* is the one behind that article! Wonderful! Why no > > > > attribution, or did I just miss it? > > > What is this in aid of? We all know you're an asshole ... no need for > > > further evidence of that. > > Ah, pleasant and refreshing! That's my Benny! > wrong on all counts, lamer ... you see yourself living in some sort of > parallel universe? > Nice job of snipping there Benny. True to the common form of your type. > >> > > "To get technical for just a moment, the total number of bugs > at any > >> > > given time is a function of the number of Bugzilla reporters, > not a > >> > > function of the quality of Mozilla." > > > > So you mean to say that: > > > > N_bugs_in_bugzilla = A * N_registered_bugzilla_users > > > > for some suitable A? > > > Ever heard of abstraction, dipshit? > > Why no Ben, what's that? And how does it apply to anything we're > > discussing here? Is dipping shit an "abstraction" of something? > > (<===bait) > Take it as question one of an aptitude test, loser. > Awww, he's too stupid to even take that easy bait! But no really Benny, what does "abstraction" have to do with bugs in Mozilla? Fuckwad? > > > How about Heisenburg's cat? > > BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAAA!!!! > > Well now, I've heard of Werner Heisenberg (note the spelling), > A single type gives you that big a laugh? Pathetic. > BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHHAHAHHHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!! HE STILL DOESN'T GET IT!!!!! SHOULD I TELL HIM? > > and I've heard of cats. Did Mr. Heisenberg have a cat? If so, why do > > you bring it up? > That was Q2 ... your score: 0 > What's your "score", Benny? Do you even know enough to calculate it? Do you have enough cats to do so, and do you know who their rightful owners are? You still don't get it, do you rimmer? > > Oh excuse me, I meant to say, "why do you bring it up > > _assrammer_?", so's you can understand it Benny. > I can see you're inspired by this style. > No, just a lot better at it than you are. > > ("Oh no, he can use foul language better than I can! I better run and > > hide!") > You into "hide and seek"? Rape fantasies as well? or what that be > telling? > "or what that be telling"...? Are you running this through that Alta Vista translater a few times before posting Benny? > > Word to the wise, or in this case you: take a few seconds and crack an > > encyclopedia before making yourself look like a HI-LARIOUSLY inept > > teenager in front of all the other inept teenagers in here. They're > > laughing at you even harder than I am. > What was this in aid of, except to flaunt your ability to spell > en.cy.clo.pe.di.a? > Well, apparently not "in aid of" you Benny. And you're so uneducated that you think that spelling "encyclopedia" is something anybody would "flaunt"? Holy Christ. > > > How about the sound of a tree falling if no one's there to hear it? > > Much like your posts from the junior high library, huh? > _non sequitor_ ... your brain's thrashing already? > "sequitur". BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! Or is it "Heisenberg's sequitur" Benny? BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! > > > How about granularity? > > Yeah, isn't that what sand comes in? > Yes, now go play on the beach where you can be as pissy as you want > without bothering others. > Didn't your mother teach you that pissing in sandboxes was for cats? Perhaps even Heisenberg's cat. Well, assuming he had one. > > > Given a complex project, > > ...which Mozilla is not, compared to many other projects which have > > delivered in less than a decade... > rrrrrriiiiiiggggggggggggggghhhhht ... Keyboard sticking benny? > what smehly clohsut dihd you > just crawhl out of?! > Yours. > > > the number of bugs reported is directly related to the number of eyes > > > looking and the number of hands typing, > > And not at all related to the number of bugs in the software, huh? > > Of course not, you pathetic fruit cake ... you just dream this up in > order to have some pretext to continue your rant. Point: it's entirely > about your pathology and only peripherally about the project. > "Number of bugs is unrelated to the number of bugs in bugzilla", you heard it from the Benny's mouth right here. > > So if BizarroMozilla had absolutely zero defects, the number of reported > > defects would be the same as if it had nothing but defects? > *the sound of JTK's brain thrashing* > The sound of benny stumped. > > > Welcome to the wonderful world of OpenSource, ya friggin' twit. > > A world where bugs that don't exist count the same as those that do. > That's how you see it? Nope, that's what you just said dumbfuck. > You really do have your head up your ass. > No, *you* have your head up my ass. How's it taste up there? Can you check for polyps while you're up there benny? Thanks. > > Wow. Ya friggin' fudgepacker. > Point: this is how you react to something that exists only in your > piss-stained mind. > Point: You really do have your head up your ass. Oh wait, that's your line. > > > > All it does then is track entries made by registered users, which may in > > > > fact be bugs in Mozilla, or bugs in other products, or recipies, or > > > > porn, or maybe they're just using it as a substitute for NNTP or email, > > > > whatever. > > > yada yada yada ... the sound of one twit flapping > > Ah, an interesting perspective you bring Benny! And not even punctuated > > remotely properly. > You're fixated! You really believe this is about punktuashun? ... No, I really believe "this" is about you being an immature teenager, me being better than you, and you unable to handle it. > lamer > Come on benny, are you out of names to call me *already*? I got plenty left, nutjob! > > > > BTW: I know you won't take this for what it's worth, but I read both > > > > articles in their entirety. While yours is written better, his is more > > > > factually correct and less biased. > > > *Yikes!* I _knew_ you weren't iredeemable! *I'mma gonna shoot that > > > word!* > > You're gonna have to learn how to spell it first, dickless. > the point stands > Random words again. Must be that "Schroedinger Uncertainty Principle" in action, huh benny?* ^^ Yeah yeah, umlauts. *Five'll get you ten he *still* won't get it! > > > _credit where credit is due_ ... wow ... JTK is not _entirely_ > > > bereft of positive aspects! > > Of course I am, what are you talking about, dumbass? > That's just your way of squirming away from anything other than > self-indulgent trash. (Self-deprecatory as well, one might note.) > Indeed it is benny. Indeed it is. > > > Man, ain't that a light on the horizon! > > Well let me look here... yep, that's what it looks like alright! And > > for God's sake clear out some of that ear wax, Christ, ya ever hear of > > "Heisenberg's Q-Tips"? > > Let me step through your logic here: BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHHAHAHAHA!!! Yeah, this oughtta be good! > you agree that giving credit > where credit is due's light on the horizon, and therefore I should get > Q-Tips to clean my ears ... Nope. Once again you completely missed the insult. That's my fault though, I tend to aim *way* too high in these situations where I outmatch my "opponent" by a few orders of magnitude. > nope laddy, no entailment there ... just > the sound of you splashing around in the piss-warm world of your > solipsism. > Is there a "Dumbshit's Thesaurus" or something where the legions-worth of boys such as yourself get both big words they don't understand and junior-high "insults"? > *When it falls off a cliff and crashes through the wind shield of your > car, it becomes immediately clear that a rock is a rohk is a rawk.* Wow, that's deep ben. God.
