JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > jesus X wrote: > > Blake Ross wrote: > > > Fact: you are terribly misinformed. > > > The number of bugs has skyrocketed over the years because the number of > > > people reporting them has skyrocketed over the years, and because we > > > have more features and components than we used to. [...] > > You are 100% right. In fact, I call it Bugzilla Inflation, and go into > > detail in that article under the Bugzilla Inflation and Bugzilla Facts > > sections. thanks go to Asa for helping me compile those numbers, too. > AH! So *THE LORD* is the one behind that article! Wonderful! Why no > attribution, or did I just miss it? What is this in aid of? We all know you're an asshole ... no need for further evidence of that.
> Anyway, perhaps then rabbi you could explain this little gem of apologetics > from that gem of an apologetic article: > "To get technical for just a moment, the total number of bugs at any > given time is a function of the number of Bugzilla reporters, not a > function of the quality of Mozilla." > So you mean to say that: > N_bugs_in_bugzilla = A * N_registered_bugzilla_users > for some suitable A? Ever heard of abstraction, dipshit? How about Heisenburg's cat? How about the sound of a tree falling if no one's there to hear it? How about granularity? Ooops, I forgot that your thought is contrained by the need to piss on something. Given a complex project, the number of bugs reported is directly related to the number of eyes looking and the number of hands typing, yes. Welcome to the wonderful world of OpenSource, ya friggin' twit. > All it does then is track entries made by registered users, which may in > fact be bugs in Mozilla, or bugs in other products, or recipies, or > porn, or maybe they're just using it as a substitute for NNTP or email, > whatever. yada yada yada ... the sound of one twit flapping > BTW: I know you won't take this for what it's worth, but I read both > articles in their entirety. While yours is written better, his is more > factually correct and less biased. *Yikes!* I _knew_ you weren't iredeemable! *I'mma gonna shoot that word!* _credit where credit is due_ ... wow ... JTK is not _entirely_ bereft of positive aspects! Man, ain't that a light on the horizon! hfx_ben
