Pascal Chevrel wrote: > > David Tenser wrote: > > Yes, it's obvious that Mozilla's aim is to make a near-perfect, secure > > webpage renderer. Gecko is the heart of it all. > > > > The problem is, too few real people are actually using Mozilla, so no > > one knows just how many security holes there is in it (and I bet it's > > *hundreds*, based on the the number of bugs reported every day). You > > simply can't say that Mozilla is a good replacement for IE when it comes > > to security. We simply don't know that yet. > > There are probable more mozilla testers than IE will ever have !
Mozilla has 0.73% market share at last count. According to laughably generous assumptions of geometric growth, Mozilla will break the 50% market share barrier some time in 2007. In no possible scenario does Mozilla now, nor will it ever, have more people leaning on it than IE does. The tree fell in the woods, and nobody heard it folks.
