JTK wrote: > Pascal Chevrel wrote: > >>David Tenser wrote: >> >>>Yes, it's obvious that Mozilla's aim is to make a near-perfect, secure >>>webpage renderer. Gecko is the heart of it all. >>> >>>The problem is, too few real people are actually using Mozilla, so no >>>one knows just how many security holes there is in it (and I bet it's >>>*hundreds*, based on the the number of bugs reported every day). You >>>simply can't say that Mozilla is a good replacement for IE when it comes >>>to security. We simply don't know that yet. >>> >>There are probable more mozilla testers than IE will ever have ! >> > > Mozilla has 0.73% market share at last count. According to laughably > generous assumptions of geometric growth, Mozilla will break the 50% > market share barrier some time in 2007. In no possible scenario does > Mozilla now, nor will it ever, have more people leaning on it than IE > does. > > The tree fell in the woods, and nobody heard it folks. >
JTK, you really behave childishly. We can all see you whining day after day, posting the same message 10 times a day. Don't you ever get bored ? As for your statitics, I could underline the fact that the last time you used it as an argument, it was 0.75%. I could also mention the fact that the very source you rely on says that Mozilla market share varies from 0.85% to 8.1% according to sources. I could also point out the fact that on my own website, Mozilla users were 0.5% last November and 3.5% in January, not so bad a growth for a browser not targeted to the general public and whch is not even finished. The site of one of my friends even gets 12% mozilla visitors (probably thanks to its Linux section). If you hate mozilla, why do you spend your days writing in this group ? Aren't you tired of bothering the others ? You remind me of an old dear who was my neighbour and spent its days complaining about her neibours, her neighbours' children, her neighbours' cars, her neighbours trees... Pascal
