S�ren Kuklau wrote: >> I don't understand what you mean. Why is it worse for a woman to see a >> spam message than for a man? > > Two words: Porn mail. This is usually directed men. Women might consider > it quite "disturbing", and I could understand that.
Some women find porn mail offending, some women don't. The same applies to men. But Phillip suggested that it is, for some reason, worse for a woman who finds porn mail offending to see a porn mail than it is for a man who finds porn mail offending, and that just strikes me as incredibly 19th-century-like. As Kryptolus said, "Drop the 'manly' act. This is how opression of women worked in the first place.". /Jonas
