Gervase Markham wrote: >> Well if there are only seconds and no objections I think it should be >> done. Somebody could just "rm robotx.txt"... > > This is not a good idea. Google's index of a bug would rapidly go out of > date.
Yes and no. You're right that it'd go out of date /rapidly/ but sooner or later it'll be indexed becoming avaiable and, IMO, the utility of the Google (or your favorite search engine) indexing is more the ability to able to search quickly in all the Bugzilla database and, once you had the first results with it, you can always use the real Bugzilla for the latest information. > You are solving the wrong problem. If Bugzilla's querying system makes > it hard for you to find the bug you want, we should simplify the > querying system, not reinvent it. This is not reinveting, is outsorcing part of the system and/or of the problem for free ;). Andrea -- Andrea Monni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "It is our choices, Harry, that Y! IM: andreamonni show what we truly are, far ICQ: 7387142 more than our abilities." Tiscali NetPhone: 178-229-5413x165 A. Dumbledore
