In article <a5e5kr$6nlkc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, michael lefevre wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: >>> having googling >>> sucking down pretty much the entire contents of the bugzilla database at >>> frequent intervals could well be a significant burden on the bugzilla >>> server(s)... >> >> You are talking about how you think Google works. Google doesn't do >> that. It will refetch more often the pages that it thinks are important >> according to its "page ranking", i.e.: a few. Besides, search engines >> who care enough to voluntarily skip sites who ask it politely, care also >> to space requests in order to not impact too much on the server load. > > i'll admit i don't know the details, and what i wrote above was probably > an exaggeration... however, if google doesn't update the pages > frequently, then you have the other criticism that it will be out of > date... >
More to the point, this is solving a problem that doesn't exist. It's already quite possible to do a full-text search on Bugzilla comments. The problem is that one tends to get either no results, or far too many. Google will not solve this. -- Chris Hoess
