> Interesting idea... what happens when multiple elements within the page > are scrollable, such as elements with css "overflow:scroll", framesets, > iframes, or form elements? How about pages that scroll horizontally?
- such as elements with css "overflow:scroll": Ok, a bug. - form elements: A form it is not a page, it is a... form. - framesets, iframes: i dont see a problem here... - How about pages that scroll horizontally?: heh... the floating window will illustrate the width and height of the canvas; the red frame describes the zone of the page that you actually have on the screen. Doesnt metter the dimentions of the page, just slide the red frame. > It looks to me like the proposed "slider" window is just a scrollbar > that is very short and very wide, with no scrollbar arrows, and the > scrollbar "thumb" is a red outlined box. And, of course, it floats in a > separate "window", which seems to me like it would just confuse the user > since it's not clear what part of the screen it applies to, and it > obscures content. > - i guess that the previus description clarify this. > Is this a solution to a problem that doesn't exist? > - The BIG problem i acctually see on mozilla is that the Sidebar is the Only(one, uno, un, ein,um.) NEW thing it can be offer. Just take a look to the actuall last builds fullscreen; there is no diference with IE fullscreen... > "...gives life to the monitor by allowing the web pages talk by > themsel[ve]s." That's hilarious! > - Again, and talking about User Interface. Why Mozilla wants to be an IE clon? Is going to kill it making that?. \ I would like to see on the next releases of Mozilla an innovator user interfaz; a new language which enhance the cominication between the application and the user. \ U.I. is almost the principal reason of why people choose an aplication.
