"Gervase Markham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > The easiest thing to do is just plonk, killfile, or pass over anything > > by that little troll who started the thread > > Our release numbering scheme is not the most transparent thing in the > world, and has confused many people before (and surely will do so > again.) There's no need to call people names because they don't > understand it. > > Gerv >
Correct. Mozilla .9.9 is released to the public because the public can download it. If they don't want it released, don't allow the public to download it. Here is the problem, anyone can download .9.9 for windows, and claim it's a peice of crap and all the Mozilla people will claims it's not an "official" release. However, when downloading it, and doing a version search, it says Mozilla .9.9 - not Mozilla .9.9-beta. The Mozilla folks have had four years, and still not a full version release. I don't blame the Mozilla folks, I blame AOL-Time Warner for not caring about their own product and not giving it the real support it needs. Mozilla .9.8 looked real smooth 2 weeks ago, it clearly has gone in full retreat since then. -- Kyle
