S�ren Kuklau wrote: > Mr. M.P. Thomas replies to it with an opposite opinion, called "Better > than MSIE? In a few more years, maybe" [2]. I don't certainly agree > with his post, but his points aren't really invalid either.
While I agree that mpt (if it has really been him - mpt, can you confirm?) is a bit extreme with his statement there, he has a point: The sidebar, cookie management etc. mean little to most users. They know cookies only from the grocery, and the sidebar looks overloaden and confusing to them, I guess. Stability (e.g. not to take the Windows UI down with us) and security could mean something to them, but they are more abstract things. I value mpt's opinions, because he sometimes gets me back to how the majority of the users out there sees us. > The first reply [3], by Asa Dotzler, is just a nice one, as we all > know it from Asa. IMO, even that is too cynical. What is Javascript? What do users need a JS console for? Many users would prefer, if Mozilla just looked and behaved like the rest of Windows(without the crashes :) )/Mac/GTK/KDE, rather than having skins that break with the next update. > Now to the third one [4]. What the h*ll happened to Chris Nelson? 1) Compare [1] 2) He probably didn't know that mpt is such a valueable Mozilla contributor. [1] <http://www.webstandards.org/mozillazine.html> <http://www.mozillazine.org/articles/article1524.html>
