Kryptolus wrote: > jukola wrote: > >> Kryptolus wrote: >> >>> jukola wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I responded to a "S�ren Kuklau" , not you. I have, most likely, >>>> replied you already. >>>> >>> >>> >>> No. You did not reply to me already. >>> Trolls have a tendency to ignore facts. Is that so? >>> I say it again. Read my reply. >>> >> >> Once again. Troll accusation. If the truth is not as per your liking, >> bend it. >> >> There is a message from you timed 00:16 CET to which I replied 00:52 >> CET. This is the only message I have from you. Please check your >> inbox again. Please check also "unsent messages" if you have, by any >> chance, missed to send a particular reply. >> >> The thread so far, as I have it in my inbox, has become a little bit >> too complex to be quoted in this mail. It can though be done if you >> insist. >> >> -- >> jukola >> > > I access the newsgroup directly. You apparently use the mail gateway. > > My reply was posted at 18:16 EST +5. >
Your reply seem to be floating somewhere. Have not seen it and it has not been recorded or received by the mail server used by me. Once I see it I will of course reply. Strange, you latest mail arrived without any problem. No lagging what so ever. Well, it's said that 15-20% of all mails will not make it why we should be grateful for the mails we get. I will, however, take a well deserved nap now, it's almost 3 a.m. CET 16 March 2002. I need the rest. I'm not young anymore :-) -- Cheers jukola
