Christopher Jahn typed: > And it came to pass that Netscape Basher wrote: > > >>Jonas J�rgensen typed: >> >>>blackbox wrote: >>> >>> >>>>�What make them qualify to be categorized and be named >>>>'standards'? >>> >>> >>>If they are accepted by a recognized, trustworthy, >>>independent, standard-defining organization. For instance: >>> >>>Internet Engineering Task Force Request For Comments: >>>http://www.ietf.org/rfc >>> >>>World Wide Webconsortium Recommendations: >>>http://www.w3.org/TR/#Recommendations >>> >>>/Jonas >>> >> >>Which Netscape only started to care about when they became >>the minority in the browser market, then they started to >>cry foul. >> >>It is MS Explorer that defines the standards used, not the >>w3c. The w3c means nothing. >> >> >> > > > It's a shame that most of the rest of the world disagrees. > AT&T no longer supports FrontPage extensions, opting instead for > w3c compliance. >
You are a webmaster what is more important. Making sure the page looks good on MS Explorer first. I notice you don't use the Netscape/Mozilla usenet reader. At least you know an inferior product. -- Kyle "It is possible to store the mind with a million facts and still be entirely uneducated" - Alec Bourne
