And it came to pass that Netscape Basher wrote:
> Jonas J�rgensen typed:
>> blackbox wrote:
>>
>>> �What make them qualify to be categorized and be named
>>> 'standards'?
>>
>>
>> If they are accepted by a recognized, trustworthy,
>> independent, standard-defining organization. For instance:
>>
>> Internet Engineering Task Force Request For Comments:
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc
>>
>> World Wide Webconsortium Recommendations:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/#Recommendations
>>
>> /Jonas
>>
>
> Which Netscape only started to care about when they became
> the minority in the browser market, then they started to
> cry foul.
>
> It is MS Explorer that defines the standards used, not the
> w3c. The w3c means nothing.
>
>
>
It's a shame that most of the rest of the world disagrees.
AT&T no longer supports FrontPage extensions, opting instead for
w3c compliance.
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
All men are created unequal.
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
