Re: layers

[Adam D. Moss]

Gervase Markham wrote:
> 
> > 2. Implementing layers means implementing all the bizarre 4.x
> >     layer behavior. (``Bug compatibility'')
> 
> My other thought was: will we support layers for ever? If not, when are we
> going to stop supporting them? Now seems like the best moment possible.

Well said.

--Adam